Netimperative
Netimperative
  • Home
  • Ads
  • Content
  • Mobile
  • E-commerce
  • Social
  • Regulation
  • Video
  • Viral
Menu
  • Apple
  • Amazon
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • twitter
  • WhatsApp
  • YouTube

Predatory or prudent? High price of .sucks domain investigated

April 14, 2015

The price of new .sucks domains is to be investigated amid claims that brands and celebrities could be exploited.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number (Icann) has asked the US and Canadian trade authorities to investigate Vox Populi, which secured the rights to sell the name. The company denies any wrongdoing.

An influx of new domain names are going on sale in June, including potentially helpful domain endings such as boutique, .support, .travel.

However, there are also more sinister extensions, including .sucks, .fail and more adult .xxx and .porn.

These domains could be hijacked by disgruntled customers, competitors or used to host inappropriate material.

Companies will have to decide whether it’s worth $2,500 a year to tie up a .sucks address during a 60-day early access period set aside for trademark owners and celebrities that begins March 30.

If they don’t, anyone in the world will be able to register the name and set up their own protest site.

Specialist online website Domain Incite reports that actor “Kevin Spacey, Microsoft, Google and Apple have already bought up ‘.sucks’ sites in a bid to protect their reputations”, a practice is known as “defensive registering”.

Icann granted Vox Populi permission to sell the “.sucks” names but is now concerned at the price levels the Canadian company has set.

Vox Populi is allegedy selling the domians for $2,000, described as a ‘sunrise’ premium to those wishing to register ‘.sucks’ addresses early.

“Also they are using a list of words or names that have been defensively registered in the past, for which they are charging the top amount.”

By contrast, new gTLDs such as “.rocks” or “.forsale” typically sell for between $5 (£3.42) and $20 a year.

Another controversial new suffix, .porn, has already begun its early access period, drawing registrations from Microsoft, Harvard University and even pop star Taylor Swift.

Celebrities have more experience with the problems that may arise, having dealt with a barrage of new web site names when the .xxx suffix opened for business four years ago.
“Predatory”

In a strongly worded letter to Icann, the authority’s own advisory body, the Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), demanded a “halt” to Vox Populi’s “illicit”, “predatory” and “coercive” selling scheme.

But even though Icann approved the “.sucks” domain name sale and issued the licence to sell the related website addresses, it appears not to have jurisdiction over how they are sold.
There is no evidence that Vox Populi has done anything wrong, and the company told Domain Incite its pricing and policies were “well within the rules”.

Icann has referred Vox Populi to the two bodies it believes may have the regulatory authority to investigate the company’s practices: the Federal Trade Commission in the United States and the Canadian Office of Consumer Affairs, as the company is registered in Canada.

But unless the company has broken the law, it is not clear what powers Icann has over Vox Populi’s handing of the sale of “.sucks”.

Regulation Apple, brands, Google, Microsoft, Travel

Archives

Tags

advertising agencies Amazon analytics Android Apple apps Australia BBC brands Brazil broadband China Christmas comScore content digital marketing ecommerce email Entertainment Europe Facebook France games Germany global Google government images infographic local marketing media Microsoft music Privacy retail Search security smartphones technology Twitter UK video YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Top six Valentine’s Day ads for 2022
  • 2021 Halloween: digital marketing campaigns we loved this year
  • Empowering employees; the critical link between EX and CX
  • Investing in in-app social features is a must in a world that is crying out to be connected
  • QR codes, Gen Z and the future of OOH

Copyright © 2025 Netimperative.

Magazine WordPress Theme by themehall.com

We use cookies to improve the website and your experience. We’ll assume you’re okay with this, but you’re welcome to opt-out
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT